Madrid Court Upholds Right to Label Jehovah’s Witnesses a “Destructive Sect”

A court in Madrid has ruled that former members of Jehovah’s Witnesses have the right to publicly criticise the group, including referring to it as a “destructive sect,” provided their statements fall within the limits of freedom of expression.

The decision was issued on April 16 by the Provincial Court of Madrid, which upheld an earlier ruling in favour of the Spanish Association of Victims of Jehovah’s Witnesses. The court dismissed an appeal filed by Jehovah’s Witnesses, concluding that the association’s statements form part of legitimate public debate.

Judges found no violation of the group’s right to honour, stating that freedom of expression and information should take precedence when issues of public interest are involved and when statements meet standards of truthfulness and proportionality.

The ruling rejected several demands made by Jehovah’s Witnesses, including requests to remove the association’s name, shut down its online platforms, dissolve the organisation, and award damages.

In its reasoning, the court said the internal practices of Jehovah’s Witnesses are a matter of public concern due to the group’s presence in Spain and continued media scrutiny. This, it noted, allows for broader and even harsh criticism.

While acknowledging that some remarks by former members could be offensive, the court found no evidence that the association had incited or justified attacks against current members. It also noted that many involved are former adherents attempting to rebuild strained family relationships.

On the issue of “truthfulness,” the court clarified that absolute proof is not required. Instead, it said a sufficient factual basis is enough, pointing to testimonies describing experiences such as social isolation, internal pressure, and psychological effects as credible contributions to public discussion.

Carlos Bardavío, a lawyer representing the association, said the ruling underscores the importance of open debate and hearing from those who claim harm. He described the issue as one of public interest.

The association welcomed the decision, stating it supports its right to identify as representing “victims” and to raise awareness about what it describes as harmful practices.

Representatives of Jehovah’s Witnesses in Spain expressed concern about the outcome. They highlighted portions of the judgment referencing “illegitimate interference” with their right to honour and said they are considering further legal action. According to their statement, the ruling is not final and may be appealed to the Supreme Court.