Ordering Lawyer to Kneel Undermines Judicial Standards, NBA Slams Judge in Sowore Case

The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has criticised a reported courtroom incident involving Justice Mohammed Umar, stating that any directive compelling a lawyer to kneel undermines established judicial standards.

The incident was said to have occurred at the Federal High Court in Abuja during proceedings in a case involving activist Omoyele Sowore, who is being prosecuted by the Department of State Services over alleged cyber-related offences.

According to reports by SK Blog, the presiding judge cautioned defence counsel, Marshall Abubakar, over his tone while addressing the court. During the exchange, the judge allegedly directed the lawyer to step forward and kneel. Other lawyers present reportedly intervened, after which the matter was adjourned for the day.

In a statement issued by its president, Afam Osigwe, the NBA said the reported directive followed a disagreement over a proposed hearing date, during which the lawyer raised his voice and faced threats of contempt proceedings.

The association said the development raises concerns about courtroom conduct and due process. While acknowledging that judges have the authority to maintain order, it stressed that such powers are not without limits.

The NBA stated that directing a legal practitioner to kneel is not a recognised judicial sanction and does not align with expected standards of conduct on the bench. It added that allegations of contempt must be addressed through established procedures that ensure fairness, objectivity and respect for the rights and dignity of all parties.

The association also reminded lawyers of their professional responsibilities, noting that while they are expected to advocate firmly for their clients, such advocacy must remain within the bounds of courtesy and decorum.

Reacting to the development, Sowore questioned the state of justice in the country, while human rights lawyer Inibehe Effiong described the reported directive as unacceptable, stating that corporal punishment has no place in judicial proceedings.

The NBA said it would engage relevant authorities where necessary, reiterating its commitment to upholding the rule of law, professional standards and judicial ethics.