Lyon’s Running Mate, Degi-Eremienyo Defends Certificates, Says Supreme Court Did Not Give Him Fair Hearing

The Deputy Governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the November 16, 2019 governorship election in Bayelsa State, Senator Biobarakuma Degi-Eremienyo has said allegations of forgery against which was the basis for the nullification of their victory at the governorship election by the Supreme Court were unproven.

Speaking on Thursday in Abuja at a press conference, Degi-Eremienyo said the Supreme Court erred in its judgement because the people that issued the certificates in question were not contacted to clarify the certificates.

“The aim of this press conference is to defend my reputation which the Justices of the Supreme Court, whether consciously or unconsciously, subjected to scurrilous scandal, assault and unfair imputation.

“The judgment of the Supreme Court that I was not qualified to contest as the deputy governorship candidate of APC and my attendant disqualification adversely affected the governorship candidate of the APC.

“The result was that our hard-earned victory, not just for ourselves, but our party and the majority of the good people of Bayless state who have entrusted us with the mandate to democratically govern them, is threatened.

“The event of my disqualification is distressing and traumatising to me personally and, of course, a greater trauma was inflicted on my party, the governorship candidate and the good people of Bayelsa who signified their choice of who should be their governor and deputy governor.

“It is this unsolicited assault on my personality and reputation by the judgment in question that has constrained me to chart this course.

“Unless unfair imputation to character is quickly corrected, it assumes the toga of truth.

“It was clearly a desperate and calculated attempt not just to grab power through the judicial process but equally to tarnish my good image and bring same to disrepute on completely false and unproven allegations” he said.

“As a lawmaker, I know that what Section 182(1) (j) of the Constitution contemplates is that a candidate cannot present forged educational certificates not belonging to him to aid his constitutional qualification.

“Forgery can, therefore, not be defined in different context simply to lower the burden of proof in order to meet a political end.

“The seeming discrepancies in my name, which I have adequately explained by an affidavit, was not impeached by any evidence that the names were misspelt by the issuing authorities.

“The issuing authorities who are accessible by my accusers were not called to impeach my assertion in the affidavit explaining away these errors I stated which were not illegal.

“As a lawmaker, I have enormous regard for the judiciary. I am aware that my party has headed to Supreme Court for a review of the judgment.

“By the grace of God, our second journey to the Supreme Court will end in celebration” he stated.